Thursday, November 27, 2008

Something I'm thankful for today (She said yes)

Last night after soundly defeating Angela in a game of Settlers, I concluded my master plan of asking her to marry me.

Oh, and she said yes.

An angel[a] twinkles in the evening sky,
Shining among many, but unique in my gaze.
A constant fixture in the celestial deep
Providing direction and purpose,
Though separated by distances wide.
How long have I desired to reach out and hold her,
To catch this monarch in my silk-woven net.
To be with her. To be with you.
In my dreams, in sleep and wake, I jump
And reach for the heavens
Taking this star by the hand, pulling her to me.
Wingless and haloed in beauty,
She leaves me speechless and awed.
Can I, just for a moment, or a lifetime
Be blessed with her condescension
To hold her, to feel her touch, her kiss,
Her kindness, her love.
Can I share in the light she gives.
Can this dream be lived, to open my eyes
And witness the angelic before me.
Would she take my hand and lead me,
To guide and help me.
So that together we can shine in the heavens,
A constellation of two.

Tuesday, November 25, 2008

She's here!

And she loves me!

Sunday, November 23, 2008

Quick thoughts on John Taylor's "Mediation and Atonement" (1882)

Taylor's atonement theory seems to center around the 23rd and 24th chapters of his book. He provides a penal theory of atonement where laws are made by God that must necessarily be followed. According to Taylor, "No power can resist a law of God. It is omnipresent, omnipotent, exists everywhere, in all things, through all things and round all things" (169). If Taylor didn't also argue that God was the source of these laws, his language would almost make it seem that Taylor was supporting an almost Platonic concept of God where divinity is found within an omnipotent and omnipresent Law.

Taylor's penal theory is that there is a divine law by God that the punishment for sin is sacrifice. Christ then assured that the punishment was fulfilled by everyone by allowing his infinite self to be sacrificed.

While everything seems to come together nicely, this all begs the question of why God would dictate a law requiring this punishment? Why not just make sins forgivable in the first place without all the vengeful violence?

I guess Taylor could argue that to call God the "Lawgiver" (171) or say that the laws are "laws of God" (162) does not mean that God dictated them, but rather that these laws exist outside of God and that God is merely the pronouncer of those self-existing laws. However, in doing this it would than imply that there is an omnipotent, omniscient, and self-existent Truth or 'god' that is more powerful than any other god (including God the Father).

Fourth (my first tag ever)

Whenever somebody is tagged on their blog I am secretly saddened that I have never been the target of a tag. That sadness is now gone as Sylvia just recently tagged me. How joyous!

I'm supposed to post the fourth photo of my fourth photo album and provide a little description.


This is nearly five years ago during a little outing with some friends up at my parents cabin near Heber (they unfortunately sold their share when they moved to Virginia. Going back to front, left to right, we have Joe, Savanna, Big Joe, black girl, Mary, Jeremy, white girl, Tiffany, Me, and Jake. (Unfortunately I am lame and can't remember everyone's name, and hence the use of racial identification for a couple of my friends (I know, I'm a terrible friend). Taking the photo is Maggie (who is in the next photo sitting in my place).

I'm not exactly sure what the occasion for this trip was. I think it was just a quick Friday-night get away. It has also probably been a few years since I have seen any of them. Joe was my roommate and is now married with a child and living in Northern California, working for NASA or something. Savanna was blonde. Big Joe used to play running back for BYU, though I'm not sure if he ever actually had any game time. Black girl gave the LONGEST prayers ever in church meetings. She gave the opening prayer for a Stake Conference. It went 4 minutes and 48 seconds. Yes, we actually timed it. Mary went to see Matrix 3 with me once. I made out with her to spite my ex-girlfriend (who was friends with her). Yeah. I'm a jerk. Jeremy is married to Tiffany. He actually proposed to her while we were up there. White girl is now married. Last time I saw her she was working at Wal-Mart. Tiffany is married to Jeremy. She said yes to his proposal. Maggie is also married and has a pair of kids I think. Jake is currently working on a nursing degree.

Now I guess I'm supposed to tag four other people. I tag Nancy, Jack, Bryant, and Becky.

Saturday, November 22, 2008

JFK in SLC

 
The Deseret News recently located and will soon release never before seen photos of John F. Kennedy's visits to Salt Lake City, both as a campaigning senator and as a visiting president. 

To see him speaking in the Mormon Tabernacle stands in contrast to the normally apolitical role the LDS Church plays today. You can read about it and see more photos here.

50 points if you can name the prophet

"And the angel of the lord came unto me, snatching me up from my place of slumber. And took me on high, and higher still until we moved to the spaces betwixt the air itself. And he brought me into a vast farmlands of our own midwest. And as we descended, cries of impending doom rose from the soil. One thousand, nay a million voices full of fear. And terror possesed me then.

"And I begged, 'Angel of the Lord, what are these tortured screams?' And the angel said unto me, 'These are the cries of the carrots, the cries of the carrots! You see, ________________, tomorrow is harvest day and to them it is the holocaust.' And I sprang from my slumber drenched in sweat like the tears of one million terrified brothers and roared, 'Hear me now, I have seen the light! They have a consciousness, they have a life, they have a soul! Damn you! Let the rabbits wear glasses! Save our brothers!' Can I get an amen? Can I get a hallelujah? Thank you Jesus."

Wednesday, November 19, 2008

Expelled: No Intelligence Found - Why Ben Stein's documentary on intelligent design lacks intelligence

Bueller.

Bueller.

Bueller.

Don't let Ben Stein fool you with his role as Ferris Bueller's teacher, his Clear Eyes commercials, or his self-named Comedy Central trivia show. His recent documentary, Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed is pathetic.

Aptly named, this documentary (which I forced myself to watch to the end last night) proves that it lacks intelligence by completely ignoring the primary argument used by scientists for not accepting intelligent design (ID) as science - ID does not, nor can it, provide any testable hypotheses.

If you ask any scientist who does not accept ID as science why they do so, this will be the main reason they give; and yet this key argument is not mentioned a single time throughout all of the whining and complaining done by Ben Stein and his fellow ID theorists in the film. Instead of even acknowledging this important bit of information, they instead conjure up absurd conspiracies and even try to use fear-mongering by poorly and fallaciously attempting to tie Darwinism to Nazism and eugenics.

After watching the documentary, I was completely flabbergasted (love that word). How is it that they could have wasted nearly 2 hours of my time complaining of ID not being accepted as science, when they don't even acknowledge the primary reason given for their exclusion.

That they interview Dawkins and other critics of ID, but fail to mention this point further shows the dishonesty of Ben Stein and the film's producers as these critics would have surely brought up their main criticism of ID.

Ugh.

I won't even go into their repeated misreprestations of evolution, Darwinism, science, and historical facts. For that you can check out this site.

Saturday, November 15, 2008

8 Aftermath - Part 4

"In a temple recommend interview you are asked if you sustain the leaders of our Church. If you disagree with the Church on Prop 8 then you cannot answer yes to this question."

I do sustain my Church leaders both high and low. When asked in a temple recommend interview if I sustain my leaders, I can unquestioningly answer yes. To sustain them means to acknowledge and uphold their divine calling. I do that. It does not mean to accept every word they say. It does not mean to think them infallible, nor does it mean that we have to do everything they ask. As mentioned before, concerning Prop 8, Elder Clayton said that "Latter-day Saints are free to disagree with their church on the issue without facing any sanction."

Finally, some quotes for thought:

"Do not, brethren, put your trust in man though he be a Bishop, an Apostle or a President; if you do, they will fail you at some time or place; they will do wrong or seem to, and your support be gone; but if we lean on God, He never will fail us... When men and women depend on God alone and trust in Him alone, their faith will not... be shaken if the highest in the Church should step aside ... Perhaps it is His own design that faults and weaknesses should appear in high places in order that His Saints may learn to trust in Him and not in any man or woman." - George Q. Cannon


Or Brigham Young:

"I am more afraid that this people have so much confidence in their leaders that they will not inquire for themselves of God whether they are led by him. I am fearful they settle down in a state of blind self-security, trusting their eternal destiny in the hands of their leaders with a reckless confidence that in itself would thwart... Read More the purposes of God in their salvation, and weaken the influence they could give to their leaders, did they know for themselves, by the revelations of Jesus, that they are led in the right way. Let every man and woman know, themselves, whether their leaders are walking in the path the Lord dictates, or not. This has been my exhortation continually." (Journal of Discourses, v. 9, p. 150)


"How easy it would be for your leaders to lead you to destruction, unless you actually know the mind and will of the spirit yourselves." (Journal of Discourses, v. 3, p. 45)

8 Aftermath - Part 3

"We were not the only ones who supported Prop 8, but we seem to be the only ones being targeted."

There are the a few reasons why the LDS Church is being targeted.

1. Funding for Prop 8 was 60-80% paid for by LDSaints, many of which do not live in Utah. Volunteering for Prop 8 was 75-90% done by LDSaints. So while it was true that the Church was a part of the Coalition, in terms of money and labor, the LDS Church was the coalition.

2. Here in California, the Church STRONGLY pressured members to 'volunteer' and donate to Prop 8. In most wards, large chunks (and often the entirety) of Sabbath meetings were geared around Prop 8. Affluent members were privately asked to donate specific amounts of money and each stake was given a specific quota they were asked to fulfill. My stake was asked to raise $64,000. Many members who refused to help or opposed Prop 8 were released from their callings and/or had their temple recommends suspended even though Elder Clayton said that "Latter-day Saints are free to disagree with their church on the issue without facing any sanction." On more than one occasion, Church leaders (high and low) used rhetoric implying that anyone who opposed Prop 8 were following Satan. Many of my friends who supported Prop 8 told me that they were very bothered by how much members were pressured to actively support 8. I have several friends who just had to stop going to Church because they were being singled out in meetings and publicly ostracized for not volunteering or signing e-mail lists

3. For practical purposes, the Church was the most identifiable member of the Coalition to protest. Many have complained that black voters weren't being protested. The problem with this is that there is no Church of Jesus Christ of Black that could be targeted. The LDS Church is a large organization that could easily be targeted and represented as a whole with symbolic protests at temples and headquarters. There is no analogous representative place to protest blacks, protestants, or Catholics as a whole - especially when these were never formally supported at anything more than a local level.

8 Aftermath - Part 2

"Prop 8 was voted on and they lost. That's what makes America so wonderful- the right to change laws by public vote. The majority won. Get over it."

To simply say this ignores the beauty and important role that our constitutional government and the history of protest have played in our country.

We (thankfully) don't live in a strict democracy. We are a constitutional democratic republic. Our government was specifically set up to prevent the majority from forcing its beliefs on and refusing the rights from the minority. We have a constitution that secures certain rights and a supreme court that tries to ensure that the majority does not infringe upon the protected rights of the minority.

As LDSaints we should be very glad that our government was established this way, or we might not be able to worship as we please. However, as our own LDS history shows, the government isn't always perfect and sometimes the majority has wrongfully been able to infringe upon the rights of the minority. That is where our country's history of protest comes in. Our nation was founded on protest. Every July Americans celebrate and praise the (often very violent) protests of our forefathers. What if they succumbed to the majority who said "The majority won. Get over it." This history of protest has changed our country in many ways. Women and minorities now have the right to vote. Workers are protected from abusive and oppressive business practices. Government-sponsored racism has largely been done away with. Nearly every positive change we have in our country was brought about by the protest of the oppressed. What if all of these protesters simply stopped when told, "The majority won. Get over it."?

If you were living in the 60s would you tell Rosa Parks "The majority won. Get over it. Now get to the back of the bus."?

Were Rosa Parks who refused to move to the back of the bus, blacks who wanted the education their white neighbors could get, women who wanted equal pay, and blacks who wanted to get married "acting like spoiled children who didn't get their way."? I am sure you do not feel this way, yet you carelessly accuse the gay community of being this way.

Friday, November 14, 2008

8 Aftermath - Part 1

As I said before, I'm done debating about whether or not Prop 8 was right or wrong, or whether or not the Church should have gotten involved as it did.

Following the election, however, there has been a lot of tension, hurt, angst, and accusations being tossed across the large and divisive rifts that this issue has caused, especially that of between LDSaints and the gay community, as well as between LDSaints who supported and opposed Prop 8.

The following are parts of a discussion I had to a friend of mine on Facebook. Her remarks were very typical of things I have heard from many LDSaints in the last week.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

"To [LDSaints] living in California, our prayers reach out to you for protection. We love you."

Why not pray and weep for the tens of thousands who, rightly or wrongly, just had their hearts ripped out of their chests a week ago. Instead of further demonizing them, shouldn't we be taking the Christlike step and start loving them even more?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I'm not condoning the vandalism, nor am I condoning the hateful things that a minority among the gay community have said and done. Those things are wrong without saying.

However to think that LDSaints and the LDS Church are innocent victims who were merely exercising their religious rights is too avoid the harsh reality of life: While we have the right to voice our opinions, we have to do so realizing that others may not like what we have to say and will express their rights to speak as well. When you're taunting a dog, you shouldn't complain when it tries to bite you.

Whether or not the Church was right in it's heavy involvement with passing Prop 8, this is not the time to prove how right the Church is. Tensions are really high right now. There are a lot of emotions, hurt, and anger being felt right now. To proclaim, as you have (and the LDS Church has implicitly done) that "The majority won. Get over it." does nothing but stir up hatred and anger even more. Can you really imagine Jesus acting in this way? If you do, perhaps we believe in a different Jesus.

Furthermore, for you to ask, "but what about freedom of religion rights?" or to proclaim that "groups like LGBT are trying to force religions to change their point of view" are just blatantly false. To make an analogy between the passing of Prop 8 and the protests of some in the gay community are just totally misguided. Prop 8 used the state to legislate against the wishes (and for what many believe to be a religious right of worship) of homosexuals who wanted to get married. There is nothing analogous in the protests of some in the gay community. They aren't trying to pass legislation against the Church or LDSaints restricting theirs right to believe how they please. Neither are they trying to tell the LDS Church to change its beliefs. Rather, they are just asking the LDS Church to not use its religious beliefs to pass legislation against them.

A new Harry Potter trailer

Okay. So I'm a big Harry Potter fan.You should check out the new trailer here (higher quality).

Or you can just watch the Youtube version.


and here is the teaser with tom riddle / voldemort.

and here is the international trailer


redneck conspiracy theory

i dunno about the sprinklers, but maybe there was something in her drinking water growing up.

Thursday, November 13, 2008

Five Years and a Face Lift

A few days ago Project Mayhem turned five years old. My first blog post was written November 10th 2003 when I was the only person whom I knew who had a blog or even knew what a blog was. (For those of you who still don't know, the word blog is a shortened version of web log or weblog). Since that time, blogging has become a (or the) new means of online communication. Blogs have transformed politics and have been the cause of hundreds of thousands of abandoned children - due to mommy bloggers who spend hours online busy writing and reading about the children they are neglecting.

In celebration (if you can call it that) of arriving at my 6th year of blogging, I have decided to give Project Mayhem a face lift. Now that I am in graduate school and needing to provide more academic and professional security for my future self, this facial reconstruction is also meant to reflect the more professional, academic, and mature tone that I hope my posts to eventually attain. (Though I still plan to sour my blog with the occasional immature douchebaggery).

That is the intent anyway, we'll see if it actually pans out.

The font, colors, layout, etc. are in no way established. I'll be working on those over the next few weeks. Also, I've decided to abandon the 5-year use of all lower-case lettering to make my posts more legible. Even I often had difficulty reading my posts due to the lack of capitalization.

Tuesday, November 11, 2008

done with debating prop 8

i am done debating prop 8. i will still be moderating forgivenessfor8.blogspot.com but besides that i will no longer discuss nor debate prop 8 or homosexuality. i am done. it has just caused way too much pain and frustration. i can't risk my relationships, church membership, nor my professional opportunities. thank you to those who have been supportive.

i am not an apostate. i am not against god. i am not against my church.

*****FACEBOOK USERS - PLEASE LEAVE YOUR COMMENTS ON THE ORIGINAL POST BY CLICKING 'View original post' BELOW*****

Monday, November 10, 2008

The world is barren enough.

"What is this, to you? Nobody is asking you to embrace their expression of love. But don't you, as human beings, have to embrace... that love? The world is barren enough.

"It is stacked against love, and against hope, and against those very few and precious emotions that enable us to go forward. Your marriage only stands a 50-50 chance of lasting, no matter how much you feel and how hard you work.

"And here are people overjoyed at the prospect of just that chance, and that work, just for the hope of having that feeling. With so much hate in the world, with so much meaningless division, and people pitted against people for no good reason, this is what your religion tells you to do? With your experience of life and this world and all its sadnesses, this is what your conscience tells you to do?"


please contribute http://forgivenessfor8.blogspot.com/

*****FACEBOOK USERS - PLEASE LEAVE YOUR COMMENTS ON THE ORIGINAL POST BY CLICKING 'View original post' BELOW*****

Saturday, November 08, 2008

seeking those also seeking forgiveness

steve m. and i put this together today:

seeking forgiveness.

*****FACEBOOK USERS - PLEASE LEAVE YOUR COMMENTS ON THE ORIGINAL POST BY CLICKING 'View original post' BELOW*****

Wednesday, November 05, 2008

seeking forgiveness

"thanks. i am one of those guys who hopes to get married soon."

i had never voted with a punch card before. each time i had voted in utah it was with an electronic voting machine, which was rather simple: press your finger on the name of the guy you are voting for, watch it change color, and then press confirm to move onto the next one. these punch cards scared me. it's not that they are difficult to use, any child could do it. it's that this year i felt my vote was more important than ever.

i wasn't too worried about my vote for obama, whose electoral votes were pretty much locked in california. i was much more worried about proposition 8 where a simple majority (50% +1) could strip away the rights of california couples because of their sexual orientation.

is the ballot fully inserted? check. are the two red knobs poking through the holes? check. obam/biden. punch. did it punch through? check. not too difficult... prop 8. the space next to 'no'. check. ok. that's the right spot, right? ok. double check. ok. punch. did it punch through? check. double check. am i sure i punch the right one? check. double check. triple check. alright...

i turned in my ballot, watched it get counted, and left the building with a sticker on my chest telling the world that i had just participated in our democratic process.


outside the polling station in the parking lot stood a couple of volunteers with their last attempts to urge voters to vote down proposition 8. in blue with red and white lettering their signs read:

VOTE NO ON PROP 8
UNFAIR & WRONG

i walked up to one of the volunteers and thanked her for her work. her name was jeanette. with her cheerful smile she thanked me and wished me a good day.

as i pulled out of the parking lot i noticed a woman across the street standing in her yard which was thoroughly decorated with signs supporting proposition 8. she sat in a lawn chair near the road holding a yellow sign with baby blue lettering:

PROTECT MARRIAGE
VOTE YES ON PROP 8

she was also smiling. though i obviously disagreed with her, i admired her braving the cool weather and possible scorn for going out of her way to support what she thought was best.

'you need to go back and help jeanette'

in mormon lingo, we call it the still small voice. i tried to ignore it at first as it was almost noon and i had a lot of studying to do before my 4pm class. the more i tried to ignore it though, the stronger it became until i knew i needed to go back. i made myself a quick lunch, read as much as i could in an hour, and drove back to the polling station a few miles away.


the woman in her yard, who looked awfully like a mormon mother, was still outside. just inside the parking lot stood jeanette and another guy smiling and waving with their signs as cars pulled in.

"hey. do you have an extra sign i can hold for a while?"

she handed me a sign and asked how long i could help. for a couple hours, i told her, i have a class at 4 and have some studying left to do before then. she thanked me and told me a short list of rules about how far i away i need to be from the door of the polling station, about not being confrontive, etc, and said she was glad i want to help as she and the other guy would have to leave shortly for a break and would return with new volunteers.

i picked a spot near the entrance of the parking lot, turned on my ipod, and began smiling with my sign to all the cars coming in.

i am completely serious when i say that this was a deeply spiritual experience for me.

within 15 minutes, the other volunteers left for their break and i was left alone in the parking lot with my sign. the clouds began to block out the sun and cool breeze began to blow, just enough to make me slightly uncomfortable in my shorts and thin running jacket.

judging by the responses of those in the cars, i began to feel confident that the amendment would not pass. i received far more gestures of appreciation (smiles, thumbs up, and waves) than i received gestures of disapproval (disgusted frowns, thumbs dowm, and the occasional middle finger). though i had to remind myself that perhaps most who made no gesture at all were also going to vote yes on the measure.

two hours went by and i was still alone. instead of volunteers returning to take my place, the woman across the street returned with her yellow and baby blue sign, this time accompanied with her 8 or so year old son. he seemed excited to help and shouted out 'vote yes on prop 8!' as loud as his little voice could. it was getting much colder now and i wasn't sure how much longer i could stay out.

and yet i couldn't leave. i didn't want to leave.

the humid cold began to numb my fingers, requiring me to alternate which hand would receive some warmth in a pocket as the other held the sign, and a lingering cough from a cold i have had began to slightly increase and worsen. my legs were cold and my weak back was starting to ache from standing in place for so long.

a woman came up and thanked me for doing this. marilise. she grew up in claremont and said it took some courage to do this out here as claremont is fairly conservative. i told her i was more worried about people from my church seeing me and making judgments.

another woman in a white van pulled up, rolled down her window, and began yelling at me. she accused me of breaking the law with what i was doing. i smiled and said that i was well far enough away from the doors and that i was fine. she said she was going to call the police. i told her to do that and wished her a good day. she told me to go to hell and drove off.

an elderly couple drove by and smiled, both of them giving me a big thumb up.

a man about my age drove by with his middle finger waving proudly.

a married couple, middle aged, rolled their windows down to point their thumbs to the ground. they frowned at me with disgust. i wonder what it was that i was doing to them. am i hurting you? am i taking away any of your rights? what is it that i am doing to you?

a man holding his young son's hand approached me. he had his 'i voted' sticker on his chest. thank you, he said, thank you for standing out here and doing this. he asked if i was a student out here. we chatted for a few minutes, then he went away.

an elderly man drove by yelling something i couldn't quite understand. i'm pretty sure he didn't like what i was doing. again i wondered what it was that i was doing to him.

another hour passed and no volunteers had arrived. the woman across the street was now alone. she was looking at me. i wondered what she thought of me. was i her enemy? did she also think that i was somehow trying to hurt her?

it was getting really cold and my class had just started. my back ached and i needed to crouch in between cars to stretch my muscles. my fingers felt even more numb. i couldn't leave though. this felt too good. too right.

i don't know exactly why i felt i needed to be out there. i'm pretty sure most voters were already set with how they were going to vote. perhaps, i thought, there might just be someone or a few persons who might see me, alone with my sign in the cold, and that seeing me might just influence them to change their mind, or might finally convince the undecided. perhaps after seeing me, they would feel inspired to call and encourage friends to vote, or something. or maybe it was just for me. whatever it was, that small voice warmed what should have been frozen and encouraged me to stay. i decided to stick around for another hour until it began to get dark.

more people drove by and smiled or waved. a few others frowned or pointed their thumbs down.

a man in an suv stopped on the road, rolled down his window and yelled to catch my attention. when i looked his way he stuck out his hand with his finger held high.

others drove by and smiled and waved. others frowned. some thumbs up. another down. another middle finger.

a middle aged man in the parking lot stepped out of his car and approached me.

"thanks. i am one of those guys who hopes to get married soon."

tears welled up in my eyes. i wanted to hug him and beg for his forgiveness. i wanted to tell him how sorry i was for all who used fear and ignorance to hurt him. i wanted his forgiveness for the actions of my church. i wanted him to know that i knew that what they and so many others were doing was wrong, and hoped that he would forgive them for they know not what they do.

instead i smiled and wished him luck.

as the sun finished setting over the horizon, i wondered if and how we could be forgiven for what we have done.

driving out of the parking lot, the woman across the street was still there. i smiled and gave her a friendly wave. she smiled and waved back.





*****FACEBOOK USERS - PLEASE LEAVE YOUR COMMENTS ON THE ORIGINAL POST BY CLICKING 'View original post' BELOW*****

Tuesday, November 04, 2008

YES WE CAN


there are so many reasons why i wanted and am excited that barack obama was elected tonight. as i was driving home tonight from watching the election coverage, there is one that struck me that i hadn't really comprehended the immense meaning of until tonight. we, the american people, elected our first black president today. i started choking up and nearly started crying while driving in the dark night.

despite all of our differences, for this one thing all of us americans have something we ought to be proud of tonight.


*****FACEBOOK USERS - PLEASE LEAVE YOUR COMMENTS ON THE ORIGINAL POST BY CLICKING 'View original post' BELOW*****

yes for o and no for 8

after over two years of waiting for this day, i cast my vote for obama.

also, i voted no against discrimination and hate on prop 8.

now just waiting for the results.


*****FACEBOOK USERS - PLEASE LEAVE YOUR COMMENTS ON THE ORIGINAL POST BY CLICKING 'View original post' BELOW*****

Monday, November 03, 2008

my final pre-election prop 8 post

enjoy.



*****FACEBOOK USERS - PLEASE LEAVE YOUR COMMENTS ON THE ORIGINAL POST BY CLICKING 'View original post' BELOW*****

Sunday, November 02, 2008

the myth of 'traditional marriage'


in the quest to discriminate against others who are different, supporters of prop 8 are constantly referring to a 'traditional marriage' that same-sex marriage is threatening to destroy. for them, a 'traditional marriage' is perhaps best exemplified by the cleaver family pictured above - where ward provided for the family, disciplined his children, and offered bits of advice to the troublesome beaver; june, on the other hand, was the ideal wife and mother who spent her day at home cooking and cleaning as every good woman should.

but how traditional is this 'traditional marriage'? it all depends on how far back we want to call something 'traditional.'

before there was marriage men and women simply began cohabiting and raising children together. the institution of marriage began when women became seen as commodities that could be bought and sold in a fashion very similar to slavery. a man who wanted a particular girl to own would approach the girl's father and purchase her from him for a certain price. this is depicted in the mormon classic johnny lingo where johnny purchases mahana from her father with 8 cows. relics of this 'traditional marriage' are found in our traditions (no pun intended) of wedding rings (originally signs of slave ownership), taking the groom's name (a slave practice), and asking the bride's father for permission to marry.

'traditional marriage' was also used as an economic and political trade between familes and groups. instead of trading his daughter for money or goods, a father would barter his daughter away in exchange for trade agreements and political treatises. this form of 'traditional marriage' can still be seen in some eastern countries where arranged marriages are often performed for business purposes.

and of course, let us not forget the mormon hypocrisy of calling for 'traditional marriage' when just a hundred years ago, 'traditional marriage' looked like this:


while the 'traditional marriage' of a man and a woman and a woman and a woman and a woman and a woman and a woman was done away with just before the 20th century, 'traditional marriage' was redefined as marriage between a man and a woman of the same race. it was not until the mid-late 1960s that all prohibitions of interracial marriages were finally lifted in the united states.

until just recently my white father and japanese mother could not legally wed in certain states because it went against 'traditional marriage.' in fact, even though it was legal when they did get married, many friends and family of my father tried to dissuade him from marrying my mom because it went against 'traditional marriage.'

after 'traditional marriage' finally began to include interracial marriages, it really wasn't until the late 20th century that equality within marriage began to be an accepted part of 'traditional marriage' - and it barely even is today. still so many hold a view of 'traditional marriage' where the wife is considered inferior and submissive to her male partner, a relic of the very first form of traditional marriage.

and so today, proponents of prop 8 somehow have managed to have the audacity to think that within the last couple decades we have finally reached the pinnacle of what 'traditonal marriage' is, and want to hold this relatively young version of this myth to discriminate against others who think that our view of marriage should not be tied to its past conceptions.



*****FACEBOOK USERS - PLEASE LEAVE YOUR COMMENTS ON THE ORIGINAL POST BY CLICKING 'View original post' BELOW*****

Saturday, November 01, 2008

steve young, prop 8, and the divisive nature of 'protecting families'

in case you haven't heard, steve young is openly opposed to prop 8. not only does he have 'no on prop 8' signs on his windows, but he also has several halloween decorations on his yard which also carry an opposition to prop 8 theme.

i don't say this because his opposing lends any authority to the opposition, but rather because he is perhaps the most high profile mormon to oppose prop 8 and he will most likely suffer a lot of backlash for his choosing to openly do so.

a week ago, a good friend of mine, joe vogel, wrote an article for the huffington post about his feelings concerning prop 8. after writing "a mormon's lament," joe received a lot of harsh criticism and unfair judgments by his friends and family. so many mormons, like the pharisaic conner coyback, lashed out criticisms in the name of self-righteousness even though they know nothing of joe. if they knew the joe i know, they would take these accusations back in a heart beat. there are few people i know who have a christlike care for the other as joe does.

recently, elder whitney clayton of the seventy said that "Latter-day Saints are free to disagree with their church on the issue without facing any sanction." but yet that hardly seems to be the truth of it in mormon culture. perhaps it is only that latter-day saints are free to disagree as long as they don't say anything about it. i have been told of several accounts where members have had their temple recommends taken for openly opposing the ban on same-sex marriage. even if there is no official discipline, the culture has too often taken discipline into their own hands by accusing those who oppose the amendment of apostasy, immorality, rejecting the prophets, and worldliness - all the while not accepting that those who oppose the amendment do so because of a sincere belief that that is what christ would have them do.

as joe told me tonight, isn't it ironic that the proposition which is supposed to be protecting the family is instead dividing so many families instead.

earlier today i somehow managed to get in a discussion on facebook with my friend's grandmother (yes. his grandma facebooks). here is a message i sent to her tonight:




~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

i understand your desire to follow the prophet. i feel that same desire, which is what has made my decision to vote against prop 8 difficult to do. (on the other hand, voting for obama has been very easy). brigham young taught that we shouldn't just blindly follow our church leaders, but that we should study things out, pray earnestly, and seek the guidance of the spirit. for the last couple months i have been reading all of the arguments back and forth about prop 8. i have fasted and prayed. and in doing so, i strongly feel that i must disagree with some of those church leaders who have been pushing for prop 8.

i still hear the voice of god in what our leaders our doing. i hear a call that we need to take stands to protect our families who have been coming under attack lately. i just do not believe that the threat is coming from people who just want to be able to strengthen their loving relationships that you have been able to (and i hope to do this summer with my beautiful girlfriend).

in the book of mormon (which was written for our day), the most condemned of sins is the disparity between the rich and the poor. on almost every page we can find a condemnation of the nephites for not taking care of the poor, and it is this neglect of the poor that hurts god's children the most in the scriptures. not once is homosexuality mentioned in the book of mormon (even though it has existed in every civilization and culture).

in the end of matthew 25, jesus himself shows what it is that separates the sheep from the goats. it isn't about 'traditional' marriages verses same-sex marriages, it is about those who helped out the naked, hungry, sick, and imprisoned.

today, perhaps more than ever in the last several decades, the economic struggles that are hitting our country are hurting and destroying our families. foreclosures are kicking families out of their homes. massive lay-offs and failed businesses are making families hungry and destitute. the lack of proper health insurance is leaving our children and parents sick and injured, and are bankrupting families (30% of bankruptcies in the country are from medical costs). problems surrounding finances are a top cause of divorce today.

the culmination of our scriptures, the words of christ, and the majority of the teachings of our latter-day prophets have all shown that this is where the threat to our families is occuring.

when the rich young man asked christ what it was that he needed to do to have eternal life, christ didn't tell him to sell all he had and use it to fight homosexuality (which was quite common even then), but told him to use sell what he had and give it to the poor. christ then told his disciples that it was easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven. it was because by accumulating wealth, the rich young man was ignoring the poor and violating christ's commandment to love one another.

as i mentioned in my comment, the primary thought that has come to my mind repeatedly when struggling over my decision about prop 8 was to really ask myself, what would christ be doing in this situation. i believe he tells me to render to caesar what is caesar and to god what is god's.

just recently the church came out in salt lake and said it supported legislation in utah to allow more free agency in its alcohol laws. as covenant people we hold ourselves to a higher standard. that is our religious standard and we don't need to (nor should we in our pluralistic society) demand that others abide by our religious standard. we certainly wouldn't want others telling us that we could not marry as we pleased because it went against their religious beliefs.

one more personal note. a little over 30 years, my dad decided he wanted to marry my mother who he met while serving a mission in japan. many of his friends and family tried to talk him out of it using arguments almost identical to those being used against homosexuals who want to marry. it's hard to believe, but even high church leaders were speaking against any interracial marriages, not just with african-americans. i am glad my father went against their wishes and desires. i am glad my father did not have a 'traditional' marriage and instead decided to marry my beautiful japanese mother.

-loyd

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

if prop 8 passes on tuesday, there is going to be a lot of division that will need mending in the church. perhaps when passions have settled over time more discussion and understanding will be able to occur.


but still... i hope and pray that it fails.


*****FACEBOOK USERS - PLEASE LEAVE YOUR COMMENTS ON THE ORIGINAL POST BY CLICKING 'View original post' BELOW*****