honesty part 1
i’ve had some solo time in the canyons the last couple nights to think about things as well as an e-mail this morning from a good friend to confirm it all. i don’t know how to begin this, i just know that i need to. much of this website has been a façade hiding what has been going on in my life for the last long while. through exaggeration, sarcasm, and cryptic messages, i’ve been lying to myself and others. lately, i’ve been trying to break away from that, but in the process i’ve continued to not be honest to myself and others. i think it’s something we all do. we do it to protect ourselves, others, and the relationships we share. i think in the end, a lack of honesty tears all those things apart.
part 1 – my, myself, and god.
this may come as a startle to some of you. to others, it may be no surprise. for the last year or so i’ve struggled with my belief in god and religion. some blame may blame it on the uvsc philosophy department, but they shouldn’t. this probably would have happened either way. i can’t really explain how it all started. there was no real beginning. one day it was just there. for some reason, i just couldn’t get god to fit into the world view that i had come to see the world as. i kept going to church. i said my nightly prayers. i read my scriptures. put my garments on every day, but it somehow lost all meaning. besides the prayers and scripture reading, it all became a routine. though i still found praying and reading scriptures beneficial, they had eventually lost all divine aspects and just became modes of self-reflection and meditation.
after i moved to a new ward, i pretty much lost all desire to go to church. in my last ward, i hated going but went because it was expected of me. if i didn’t go, people would start asking questions and my bishop would most likely be knocking on my door. my idea of the ‘church’ and the ‘gospel’ seemed so different than what others were talking about in meetings. i’d bring books to entertain me through sacrament meeting and would try to be controversially thought-provoking during sunday school and priesthood. though i was questioning the divine origins of joseph smith’s theology, it was the thing that kept me hope. sure he may have had his faults, but he had a wonderful idea of community that brought a whole new meaning to religion and theology. the only problem was that in expressing this aspect of the gospel, i felt more and more like it was not what others around me saw in church.
i have heard that by sharing your testimony, it grows stronger. i tried to share it often. but inside my doubts of it kept growing stronger. suddenly it seemed i was telling others about my beliefs in god that i know longer understood or believed. i felt like i was lying to everyone including myself. intellectually, i created a view that god no longer fit in. though my intellect said ‘no’, there was still something that said something else. i’m not sure what it said. i’m not sure what it meant. it was a sort of yearning. this hope that there has got to be something more to life than live and die.
lying about things can sometimes be so much easier than being honest about them. i lied to my family and friends about my testimony. i assured everyone that it was as strong as it could be. by lying to others, i also lied to myself. why confront the problem, when it is so much easier to just lie to myself about it?
some time ago, i met someone that i felt like i could talk to about this. it felt good being honest. i felt like a burden that had been wearing me down for a long time and it was finally lifted. in telling her how i felt, i had also told myself how i had felt. it scared me. my whole life had seemed to be built around the church. suddenly, i was admitting to myself that it was no longer the same. i felt lost and confused for a while. in some ways i wish i hadn’t said anything. that’s why we are scared of being honest. it liberates in some ways, but hurts us in others.
i told my dad about my feelings when i was done telling my friend. i was scared to, but i felt like i needed to. he was the person i had lied to the most about this. my dad loves me. a lot. and it was wonderful to know that he loved me either way. however, i let that become a wedge between us. my dad was calling me all the time (something i need to learn to avoid doing) and sending me e-mails with articles and testimonies. it felt like he was trying to fix me. as if i was broken and in need of repair.
maybe i am broken. maybe i do need repair. but this is something i need to find out for myself. nobody can fix me. it’s something i have to do.
in the process of being honest, i quickly found how scary it could be and turned back to the security of lying. having already busted out the truth, i had to alter my lie. i had to protect my integrity and world view. to those who knew my doubts, i’d lie and say that it was no struggle. that it was completely liberating. that i no longer needed god or any of that in my life. i lied about the emptiness i felt. i lied about the yearning i have for something more. i lied about my gut telling me something.
so here i am. i’m not exactly sure where that is. i don’t think i really enjoy where i am, but i’m not sure exactly where i want to go. i’ve got to figure out what my gut is saying to me. to sort things out. to be completely honest with myself and others.
besides #19, none of those things have really bothered me. the church is made of humans and always has been. i wouldn't expect anything different.
ReplyDeletein fact i would disagree with aspects of 2, 3 (they have been counted), 4, 5, 9, and 21.
if anything bothers me, it's the ignorance of many members who choose to ignore certain things and the views of some leaders that the human qualities of other leaders should be suppressed.
another thing that bothers me are anti-mormons who feel they need to build up some kind of case against mormonism. i don't know what your background is, nor do i really care. i do hope though that you apply your criticisms equally across the religious field.
i've got no animosity toward mormonism. it still has a very special place in my heart. sure, there are things about the culture and organization that i find very offensive and troubling, but those things will pop up anywhere you look.
p.s.
ReplyDeletethis goes for any commentors....
please do not post your testimonies, nor post your laundry lists of why you left the church or think mormonism is evil.
this is something i'm doing on my own.
I share some of your views Tyler, however some I find to be too extreme, but in all, I really admire your courage in allowing your authentic self to be realised. It is not an easy thing to discover who one is and to discover how one thinks, and then to find that many of one's thoughts run contrary to the cultural and social institutions that we are placed in.
ReplyDeleteSo, honestly, I wish you the best of luck in your pursuit of honesty and understanding. Above all, to thine ownself be true.
veritas,
ReplyDeleteanyone who posts a 26 item list as to why they think mormonism is false, i pretty much consider an anti-mormon. the same would go with someone who did the same for islam, catholicism, zoroastrianism, any form of hindusim or whatever.
like i said, the past of mormonism doesn't bother me at all. it was largely the one thing that made it believable for me. it's when the human element is removed that things become uncomfortable and bothersome. instead of the past, it was the remaining threads of the 'traditions of our fathers' that bothered me in mormon culture. yes, i found the polygamous, racist, sexist, etc. history of mormonism's past (and lingering presence) bothersome, but for me they were never reasons to abandon it. rather my growing doubts and disbelief sprouted from concerns of the general notions of the divine and super-natural that somehow became too difficult to reconcile with the changing worldview i began creating and defining for myself.
for a while i was pretty sure that there was no turning back, that my worldview was set and that nothing could change it. but that is a rather conceited position to take. i dunno what is going ot happen. perhaps, my views will change and things will make sense for me again. i dunno.
thanks for your comment mark
What do you mean by "human element [being] removed? I need some clarification.
ReplyDeletei'm referring to this false dichotomy pushed on religions that they must either be fully originated and guided by the divine or fully originated and guided by man. by affirming this idea, those who want to hold onto the divine aspects of their religion end up denying the human elements that affect the practice and doctrine of their faith.
Also, what do you mean by the "remaining threads of 'traditions of our fathers.'"?
this is referring to traditions, folk doctrines, and even doctrines replaced with new 'revelations' that i find troubling (ie. polygamy, blacks/priesthood, sexism, etc.)
how did this post turn into me defending mormonism anyways?
veritas,
ReplyDeletei already know all of this (besides the recent temple changes - which really doesn't surprise me), so i don't see why you feel the need to report the same ol' anti arguments over and over again.
all your repeated arguments only work within the context of a 100% divinely guided theology that joseph smith himself (among many other leaders) have rejected and that i cannot recall ever accepting.
if you cannot accept something outside of the all-god or all-nothing dichotomy, then that's your thing. if you feel that a religion must be void of all social and cultural aspects in which in sprouts, then i disagree because i don't believe such a thing is possible.
as i have already said, i don't want your laundry list of reasons why you can't accept mormonism. i already know them. i know about all of the changes in the book of mormon, in the endowment, in church doctrines and policies. i know about the anti-era movement. the racism and certain church leaders. i know about the current anti-gay sentiments of many church leaders and such. i know all the crap. so stop listing them over and over again.
anti-mormonism isn't necessarily a matter of information, it's a matter of presentation. to me, you are an anti-mormon. if you have something viable and meaningful to say, then say it. if not, i'd ask that you keep your anti-mormon agenda off my site.
i almost feel like you are trying to work some reverse-psychology on me...
It all boils down to one thing: truth. Truth does not change. What was true 150 years ago is true today. I'm not talking about social norms, which are subjective. I'm talking about plain, eternal truths.
ReplyDeletei guess this is where i differ. if there is any eternal 'truth', it is unaccessible to us in its entirety. truth can only be accessed, understood, and discussed within the context of one's previous understanding which is a conglomeration of one's culture, power structures, experiences and so forth. i am a relativist as far as epistemology is concerned.
of course this then puts a twist on the way i feel about religion right now.
Remember, the Church has always condemned relativism as a tool of Satan
ReplyDeletei think i can recall some leaders speaking out against moral relativism, but as far as 'the church' goes, i don't think it is an entitity in itself that is able to speak anything.
Yes, truth in its entirety is inaccessible to us. But our culture, our upbringing, our beliefs do not affect real truth. Truth stays the same no matter what we do.
if absolute truth is unaccessible and cannot be described without the tainting of our culture/experience/etc, then referring to it as such is not possible.
I can understand how being a relativist would put a twist on the way you feel about religion right now.
probably not in the way that i am thinking. rather, my conceited idea that the worldview i accept (where god cannot fit) is correct and will not alter does not fit with my epistemological relativity. i guess it could very well change.