Heidegger and Kierkegaard

Last semester I thought that Heidegger was the king of redundancy, but now I have come to realize that what I thought last semester was not true. In fact, what I learned last semester was wrong. Instead what I thought last year about Heidegger being the king of redundancy, I have come to realize that Heidegger is not the king of redundancy, for what I thought about Heidegger being the king of redundancy was wrong. Rather than Heidegger being the king of redundancy, it is Kierkegaard that is the king of redundancy. In other words, it is Kierkegaard and not Heidegger who is the king of redundancy. Therefore what I thought last semester about Heidegger being the king of redundancy is wrong because it i rather Kierkegaard who is the king of redundancy. By this I mean that Kierkegaard is more redundant than Heidegger. And it is because Kierkegaard is more redundant than Heidegger than Kierkegaard and not Heidegger is the king of redundancy. And so thus what I thought last semester about Heidegger being the king of redundancy is wrong because it is, in actuality (and I say this because Kierkegaard is more redundant than Heidegger), that Kierkegaard and not Heidegger is the king of redundancy.